<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paint Wet Glistening Skin</title>
	<link>http://www.oweb2.com/paint-wet-glistening-skin/</link>
	<description>Free Photoshop Tutorials , Tips , Tricks and Plugins.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex I</title>
		<link>http://www.oweb2.com/paint-wet-glistening-skin/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oweb2.com/paint-wet-glistening-skin/#comment-463</guid>
		<description>:D

This is great, its just what i was looking for, i basically used the same technique but different brush (dry brush 39 px), and it works great just to add skin texture/pores

thanks,
Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.oweb2.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This is great, its just what i was looking for, i basically used the same technique but different brush (dry brush 39 px), and it works great just to add skin texture/pores</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slobodan Kapris</title>
		<link>http://www.oweb2.com/paint-wet-glistening-skin/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Slobodan Kapris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oweb2.com/paint-wet-glistening-skin/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>I suppose this could do a great job, but in SOME cases. In this case, I can see that it is not natural, and that it's "burning" a bit. But, I liked this. Greetings, Decker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose this could do a great job, but in SOME cases. In this case, I can see that it is not natural, and that it&#8217;s &#8220;burning&#8221; a bit. But, I liked this. Greetings, Decker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
